<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 655 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381578</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the treatment of sales tax subsidy and technical know-how fees as capital in nature, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It also upheld the allowance of prior period expenses and exclusion of sales tax subsidy from book profits for MAT purposes. However, the ITAT dismissed the appeals regarding bad debts, fines and penalties, and provision for warranty rejections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 655 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381578</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the treatment of sales tax subsidy and technical know-how fees as capital in nature, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. It also upheld the allowance of prior period expenses and exclusion of sales tax subsidy from book profits for MAT purposes. However, the ITAT dismissed the appeals regarding bad debts, fines and penalties, and provision for warranty rejections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381578</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>