<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 647 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381570</link>
    <description>The Court quashed the Order-in-Original levying Additional Duty of Customs, finding it unjustified. Despite the availability of an appeal remedy, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner due to established precedents and circular provisions allowing exemption based on manual extraction certificates. The impugned order was set aside, and the Writ Petition was allowed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 15:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 647 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381570</link>
      <description>The Court quashed the Order-in-Original levying Additional Duty of Customs, finding it unjustified. Despite the availability of an appeal remedy, the Court ruled in favor of the petitioner due to established precedents and circular provisions allowing exemption based on manual extraction certificates. The impugned order was set aside, and the Writ Petition was allowed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>