https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381568 The Appellate Tribunal determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal regarding the confiscation of gold bars imported as baggage. The appellant's argument that the gold bars were purchased for a family event and the original invoice was unavailable was considered. However, the Tribunal cited Section 129A of the Customs Act and Baggage Rules, 2016, limiting appeals related to goods imported as baggage. As the gold bars exceeded duty-free limits, the appeal was deemed not maintainable, and the appellant was directed to seek remedy through the appropriate forum. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. en-us Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:33:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381568 The Appellate Tribunal determined that it lacked jurisdiction to hear an appeal regarding the confiscation of gold bars imported as baggage. The appellant's argument that the gold bars were purchased for a family event and the original invoice was unavailable was considered. However, the Tribunal cited Section 129A of the Customs Act and Baggage Rules, 2016, limiting appeals related to goods imported as baggage. As the gold bars exceeded duty-free limits, the appeal was deemed not maintainable, and the appellant was directed to seek remedy through the appropriate forum. The appeal was disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 09 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381568