<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 644 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381567</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the imports of White Poppy Seeds were authorized under a valid contract and registration, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s decision. Despite initial discrepancies in import documents, the Appellant rectified these with Chinese authorities, supported by certificates and correspondence. The Tribunal accepted the Appellant&#039;s explanation and set aside the order, allowing the appeal with appropriate relief under the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575166" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 644 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381567</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the imports of White Poppy Seeds were authorized under a valid contract and registration, contrary to the Commissioner&#039;s decision. Despite initial discrepancies in import documents, the Appellant rectified these with Chinese authorities, supported by certificates and correspondence. The Tribunal accepted the Appellant&#039;s explanation and set aside the order, allowing the appeal with appropriate relief under the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>