<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 640 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381563</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld violations of SEBI Regulations by the appellant but found the imposed penalty of Rs. 4 crores excessive. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal deemed the penalty disproportionate, setting it aside and remitting the matter to the Adjudicating Officer for reevaluation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:32:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575160" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 640 - SECURITIES APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381563</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld violations of SEBI Regulations by the appellant but found the imposed penalty of Rs. 4 crores excessive. Citing a precedent, the Tribunal deemed the penalty disproportionate, setting it aside and remitting the matter to the Adjudicating Officer for reevaluation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381563</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>