https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381558 The tribunal set aside the provisional attachment order confirming two properties as proceeds of crime and involved in money laundering due to deficiencies in the decision-making process. The appellant successfully argued that the properties were acquired legitimately, supported by evidence of income from a franchise business and TDS deductions. The tribunal emphasized that the impugned order did not conclusively establish the properties as proceeds of crime and remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision within a specified timeframe. en-us Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jun 2019 21:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381558 The tribunal set aside the provisional attachment order confirming two properties as proceeds of crime and involved in money laundering due to deficiencies in the decision-making process. The appellant successfully argued that the properties were acquired legitimately, supported by evidence of income from a franchise business and TDS deductions. The tribunal emphasized that the impugned order did not conclusively establish the properties as proceeds of crime and remanded the matter back to the Adjudicating Authority for a fresh decision within a specified timeframe. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381558