<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 621 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381544</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court dismissed preliminary objections regarding the maintainability of review petitions due to the inclusion of unauthorized documents. The Court emphasized that review petitions must be considered on their merits, noting that the documents were already in the public domain. It upheld press freedom, transparency, and public interest, asserting that the documents&#039; publication aligned with constitutional guarantees. Justice K.M. Joseph concurred, highlighting the press&#039;s role in democracy and the importance of transparency. The judgment underscored the admissibility of the documents and reinforced principles of judicial decision-making.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575132" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 621 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381544</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court dismissed preliminary objections regarding the maintainability of review petitions due to the inclusion of unauthorized documents. The Court emphasized that review petitions must be considered on their merits, noting that the documents were already in the public domain. It upheld press freedom, transparency, and public interest, asserting that the documents&#039; publication aligned with constitutional guarantees. Justice K.M. Joseph concurred, highlighting the press&#039;s role in democracy and the importance of transparency. The judgment underscored the admissibility of the documents and reinforced principles of judicial decision-making.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>