https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281322 The tribunal upheld the validity of the appointments of the 3rd and 4th Respondents as Directors, the circular resolution dated 01.12.2016, and the change of designation and removal of the petitioner as Director. It dismissed the company petition, stating the petitioner failed to establish grounds for interference in the company's affairs, emphasizing the petitioner's obligation as a minority shareholder to accept majority decisions. en-us Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:36:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281322 The tribunal upheld the validity of the appointments of the 3rd and 4th Respondents as Directors, the circular resolution dated 01.12.2016, and the change of designation and removal of the petitioner as Director. It dismissed the company petition, stating the petitioner failed to establish grounds for interference in the company's affairs, emphasizing the petitioner's obligation as a minority shareholder to accept majority decisions. Case-Laws Companies Law Tue, 12 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281322