https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281329 The tribunal upheld the appellant's position based on the retrospective amendment to Rule 6 of CCR 2004, clarifying that the reversal of credit attributable to inputs used in exempted goods is sufficient. The appellant's compliance with the retrospective amendment regarding CENVAT Credit reversal led to the setting aside of the demand, except for the penalty due to non-payment of interest. en-us Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Jun 2019 06:36:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281329 The tribunal upheld the appellant's position based on the retrospective amendment to Rule 6 of CCR 2004, clarifying that the reversal of credit attributable to inputs used in exempted goods is sufficient. The appellant's compliance with the retrospective amendment regarding CENVAT Credit reversal led to the setting aside of the demand, except for the penalty due to non-payment of interest. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281329