<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1994 (8) TMI 6 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18511</link>
    <description>HC held that no question of law arose and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s approach that the Commissioner validly invoked s.263. The Commissioner was entitled to prima facie inquire whether the Revenue&#039;s interests suffered and found that the ITO had omitted necessary inquiries into the assessee&#039;s interest transactions and possible diversion of funds. The matter was remitted for further factual investigation by the ITO, since an assessment becomes &quot;erroneous&quot; under s.263 when required inquiries were not made.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57511" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1994 (8) TMI 6 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18511</link>
      <description>HC held that no question of law arose and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s approach that the Commissioner validly invoked s.263. The Commissioner was entitled to prima facie inquire whether the Revenue&#039;s interests suffered and found that the ITO had omitted necessary inquiries into the assessee&#039;s interest transactions and possible diversion of funds. The matter was remitted for further factual investigation by the ITO, since an assessment becomes &quot;erroneous&quot; under s.263 when required inquiries were not made.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 1994 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18511</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>