https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281316 The court upheld the orders of attachment and confirmation but set aside the direction for taking actual physical possession. The respondents were directed to restore possession to the petitioners, while retaining legal and constructive possession with the authorities. The petitioners were prohibited from alienating or encumbering the properties until the conclusion of criminal and confiscation proceedings. The writ petitions were allowed to the extent of setting aside the direction for actual physical possession, with no order as to costs. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281316 The court upheld the orders of attachment and confirmation but set aside the direction for taking actual physical possession. The respondents were directed to restore possession to the petitioners, while retaining legal and constructive possession with the authorities. The petitioners were prohibited from alienating or encumbering the properties until the conclusion of criminal and confiscation proceedings. The writ petitions were allowed to the extent of setting aside the direction for actual physical possession, with no order as to costs. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281316