https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281316 Provisional attachment under the PMLA did not fail for want of notice or hearing, because the adjudication record showed service of notice, repeated adjournments, substituted service and appearance through counsel, while the petitioners remained absent despite opportunity. On Section 8(4), the HC construed "possession" harmoniously with the statutory scheme and Article 300-A to mean legal or constructive possession, not immediate physical eviction after confirmation of attachment. Actual physical possession could not be taken merely on confirmation; the properties were to remain under constructive control pending confiscation and criminal proceedings, and the occupants were restored to possession. en-us Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 25 Jul 2023 10:54:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281316 Provisional attachment under the PMLA did not fail for want of notice or hearing, because the adjudication record showed service of notice, repeated adjournments, substituted service and appearance through counsel, while the petitioners remained absent despite opportunity. On Section 8(4), the HC construed "possession" harmoniously with the statutory scheme and Article 300-A to mean legal or constructive possession, not immediate physical eviction after confirmation of attachment. Actual physical possession could not be taken merely on confirmation; the properties were to remain under constructive control pending confiscation and criminal proceedings, and the occupants were restored to possession. Case-Laws Money Laundering Wed, 11 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281316