https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281315 A customs officer's recorded statement was held admissible and reliable where corroborated by strong circumstantial evidence. The appellant was intercepted in a car at an odd hour with foreign-marked gold, the engine running, and the occupants' conduct indicating coordinated activity; the absence of any explanation further supported guilt. Objections that parts of the statement were inserted by officers, that the use of "we" was improbable, and that another officer was not examined were rejected. The conviction and sentence for customs and foreign exchange offences were upheld, and the appeal failed. en-us Thu, 24 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:35:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281315 A customs officer's recorded statement was held admissible and reliable where corroborated by strong circumstantial evidence. The appellant was intercepted in a car at an odd hour with foreign-marked gold, the engine running, and the occupants' conduct indicating coordinated activity; the absence of any explanation further supported guilt. Objections that parts of the statement were inserted by officers, that the use of "we" was improbable, and that another officer was not examined were rejected. The conviction and sentence for customs and foreign exchange offences were upheld, and the appeal failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 24 Feb 1972 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281315