<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (3) TMI 809 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281314</link>
    <description>Review jurisdiction under Order 47 CPC is distinct from appellate review: if a review is refused, the original decree remains intact and an appeal may still lie, but if review is allowed the decree is recalled and the matter is reopened for rehearing, leading to a fresh decree or order. In that situation, the earlier decree no longer survives for a parallel appeal. A litigant cannot pursue review and appeal simultaneously against the same decree and must elect one remedy; where the respondent chose the appeal, the order allowing review could not stand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:26:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (3) TMI 809 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281314</link>
      <description>Review jurisdiction under Order 47 CPC is distinct from appellate review: if a review is refused, the original decree remains intact and an appeal may still lie, but if review is allowed the decree is recalled and the matter is reopened for rehearing, leading to a fresh decree or order. In that situation, the earlier decree no longer survives for a parallel appeal. A litigant cannot pursue review and appeal simultaneously against the same decree and must elect one remedy; where the respondent chose the appeal, the order allowing review could not stand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>