https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281314 The court addressed the issue of pursuing a review application and an appeal simultaneously from the same judgment, highlighting potential conflicts and emphasizing the importance of clarity. It clarified that once a review is allowed, the original decree is recalled, and the case is revived for re-hearing. The court emphasized that pursuing both review and appeal simultaneously is impermissible, requiring parties to choose one remedy. In this case, the party chose to proceed with the appeal, leading to the dismissal of the review application. The judgment underscores procedural requirements to avoid conflicting proceedings and ensure justice administration. en-us Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jun 2019 15:26:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281314 The court addressed the issue of pursuing a review application and an appeal simultaneously from the same judgment, highlighting potential conflicts and emphasizing the importance of clarity. It clarified that once a review is allowed, the original decree is recalled, and the case is revived for re-hearing. The court emphasized that pursuing both review and appeal simultaneously is impermissible, requiring parties to choose one remedy. In this case, the party chose to proceed with the appeal, leading to the dismissal of the review application. The judgment underscores procedural requirements to avoid conflicting proceedings and ensure justice administration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281314