<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (7) TMI 53 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281313</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the validity of an assessment on a dissolved firm for the assessment year 1953-54, despite the firm&#039;s dissolution. The court clarified that assessment proceedings can continue against a dissolved firm under section 44 of the Income-tax Act, imposing joint and several liability on partners. Referring to Supreme Court precedents, the court dismissed the argument against assessing a dissolved firm, emphasizing the applicability of section 44 in cases of business discontinuance. The judgment affirmed the assessment order&#039;s validity, aligning with established legal principles and leaving parties to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575088" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (7) TMI 53 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281313</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the validity of an assessment on a dissolved firm for the assessment year 1953-54, despite the firm&#039;s dissolution. The court clarified that assessment proceedings can continue against a dissolved firm under section 44 of the Income-tax Act, imposing joint and several liability on partners. Referring to Supreme Court precedents, the court dismissed the argument against assessing a dissolved firm, emphasizing the applicability of section 44 in cases of business discontinuance. The judgment affirmed the assessment order&#039;s validity, aligning with established legal principles and leaving parties to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281313</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>