<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1959 (4) TMI 37 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281312</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, holding the notice under section 34 was legal and valid, ruling in favor of assessing partners of a dissolved firm for tax liabilities even before the amendment of section 44. The rule was discharged, interim orders vacated, and a one-month stay granted for appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 14:13:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575087" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1959 (4) TMI 37 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281312</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, holding the notice under section 34 was legal and valid, ruling in favor of assessing partners of a dissolved firm for tax liabilities even before the amendment of section 44. The rule was discharged, interim orders vacated, and a one-month stay granted for appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 1959 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>