<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1949 (12) TMI 39 - FEDERAL COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281311</link>
    <description>A reviewable error apparent on the face of the record may be corrected where the final declaration conflicts with the pleadings and admitted facts. The appellant&#039;s amended objection petition claimed all properties left by the deceased, and the record showed the disputed properties formed part of that estate. The High Court&#039;s limitation of the declaration was therefore inconsistent with the record and could be corrected in review, regardless of whether the mistake arose from counsel&#039;s oversight or the court&#039;s own misapprehension. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was declared entitled to all properties covered by the gazette notification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:22:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575083" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1949 (12) TMI 39 - FEDERAL COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281311</link>
      <description>A reviewable error apparent on the face of the record may be corrected where the final declaration conflicts with the pleadings and admitted facts. The appellant&#039;s amended objection petition claimed all properties left by the deceased, and the record showed the disputed properties formed part of that estate. The High Court&#039;s limitation of the declaration was therefore inconsistent with the record and could be corrected in review, regardless of whether the mistake arose from counsel&#039;s oversight or the court&#039;s own misapprehension. The appeal was allowed, and the appellant was declared entitled to all properties covered by the gazette notification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 1949 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>