https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281310 The High Court upheld the decree, dismissing appeals by contesting defendants. Plaintiff was granted possession of suit properties as nearest reversioner to Ramachandrudu's estate. Alienations by mother and widow were deemed invalid due to lack of legal necessity. The court rejected claims under 1859 and 1867 arrangements, finding no surrender or valid family settlement. Limitation Act did not bar plaintiff's action, as cause of action arose post-Achamma's death. Plaintiff's appeal succeeded, with defendants losing claim to 2/3 share. Appeals were dismissed with costs. en-us Tue, 21 Apr 1942 00:00:00 +0630 Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:11:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281310 The High Court upheld the decree, dismissing appeals by contesting defendants. Plaintiff was granted possession of suit properties as nearest reversioner to Ramachandrudu's estate. Alienations by mother and widow were deemed invalid due to lack of legal necessity. The court rejected claims under 1859 and 1867 arrangements, finding no surrender or valid family settlement. Limitation Act did not bar plaintiff's action, as cause of action arose post-Achamma's death. Plaintiff's appeal succeeded, with defendants losing claim to 2/3 share. Appeals were dismissed with costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 21 Apr 1942 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281310