<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1128 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281309</link>
    <description>Administrative instructions requiring assessment of an employee&#039;s broader service record, including the previous three years&#039; confidential reports, must be followed before denying crossing of the efficiency bar or related promotion benefits. A decision based only on one year&#039;s adverse entry was unsustainable, especially where the adverse remarks were communicated after substantial delay and the employee was not given a timely opportunity to respond. The adverse entry could not validly be relied on, and the consequential refusal of service benefits was quashed. The matter was directed to be reconsidered by ignoring the impugned adverse remarks for promotion and withheld benefits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 11:08:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575072" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1128 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281309</link>
      <description>Administrative instructions requiring assessment of an employee&#039;s broader service record, including the previous three years&#039; confidential reports, must be followed before denying crossing of the efficiency bar or related promotion benefits. A decision based only on one year&#039;s adverse entry was unsustainable, especially where the adverse remarks were communicated after substantial delay and the employee was not given a timely opportunity to respond. The adverse entry could not validly be relied on, and the consequential refusal of service benefits was quashed. The matter was directed to be reconsidered by ignoring the impugned adverse remarks for promotion and withheld benefits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>