https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381529 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A) decision to allow depreciation on the disputed capital expenditure. It was established that the assessee did not claim double deduction, and the Tribunal found no grounds to overturn the CIT(A) order, affirming the allowance of depreciation. en-us Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jun 2019 06:44:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381529 The Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A) decision to allow depreciation on the disputed capital expenditure. It was established that the assessee did not claim double deduction, and the Tribunal found no grounds to overturn the CIT(A) order, affirming the allowance of depreciation. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381529