<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 579 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381502</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeal seeking condonation of a 582-day delay in filing against the Tribunal&#039;s order suspending a Custom Broker License. The delay explanation lacked clarity on the approval date for filing the appeal, indicating Revenue negligence in timely challenging the order. Merely citing previous cases where long delays were condoned was deemed insufficient justification. The Court emphasized that each delay condonation application must be assessed based on the provided explanation, ultimately ruling that the Revenue&#039;s negligence did not present sufficient cause for condonation of the delay, resulting in the dismissal of the Notice of Motion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 06:41:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=575005" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 579 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381502</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeal seeking condonation of a 582-day delay in filing against the Tribunal&#039;s order suspending a Custom Broker License. The delay explanation lacked clarity on the approval date for filing the appeal, indicating Revenue negligence in timely challenging the order. Merely citing previous cases where long delays were condoned was deemed insufficient justification. The Court emphasized that each delay condonation application must be assessed based on the provided explanation, ultimately ruling that the Revenue&#039;s negligence did not present sufficient cause for condonation of the delay, resulting in the dismissal of the Notice of Motion.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381502</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>