<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 566 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381489</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the order, confirming a demand of Rs. 71,55,424/- with penalty and interest. The services provided were classified under &#039;Support Service of Business or Commerce,&#039; and non-competition fees were deemed taxable. The appeal was dismissed, and the extended limitation period for the demand notice was justified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2019 06:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 566 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381489</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the order, confirming a demand of Rs. 71,55,424/- with penalty and interest. The services provided were classified under &#039;Support Service of Business or Commerce,&#039; and non-competition fees were deemed taxable. The appeal was dismissed, and the extended limitation period for the demand notice was justified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>