https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381488 The Tribunal found the rejection of the refund claim invalid, citing compliance with legal precedents and GST regulations. The appellant's entitlement to a refund of Rs. 5,13,086 was upheld, emphasizing procedural compliance and refund validation. The matter was remanded for verification of credit reversal documents as per Notification No. 27/2012. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, underscoring the significance of adhering to documentation requirements and legal precedents in tax refund cases. en-us Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 13 Jun 2019 06:40:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381488 The Tribunal found the rejection of the refund claim invalid, citing compliance with legal precedents and GST regulations. The appellant's entitlement to a refund of Rs. 5,13,086 was upheld, emphasizing procedural compliance and refund validation. The matter was remanded for verification of credit reversal documents as per Notification No. 27/2012. The appeal was disposed of in favor of the appellant, underscoring the significance of adhering to documentation requirements and legal precedents in tax refund cases. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381488