https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381479 The SC allowed the appeals of jute bag manufacturers, granting them the benefit of the Central Excise Notification No.30/2004-CE exemption. It ruled that markings required by the Jute Commissioner, such as buyer information, did not constitute brand names. These markings were for identification and control, not for indicating trade connection or enhancing value. en-us Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Nov 2024 17:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381479 The SC allowed the appeals of jute bag manufacturers, granting them the benefit of the Central Excise Notification No.30/2004-CE exemption. It ruled that markings required by the Jute Commissioner, such as buyer information, did not constitute brand names. These markings were for identification and control, not for indicating trade connection or enhancing value. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 11 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381479