https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381475 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking an earlier grant of a higher payscale to the petitioner from 15.02.1991 instead of 17.09.1992. The court held that the petitioner's failure to challenge adverse remarks from 1986-1987 within the required timeframe impacted her eligibility for the higher payscale. As a result, the court upheld the decision to grant the higher payscale from 17.09.1992, citing the petitioner's inaction in addressing the adverse remarks communicated in 1987 as a key factor in the outcome. en-us Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jun 2019 18:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381475 The court dismissed the writ petition seeking an earlier grant of a higher payscale to the petitioner from 15.02.1991 instead of 17.09.1992. The court held that the petitioner's failure to challenge adverse remarks from 1986-1987 within the required timeframe impacted her eligibility for the higher payscale. As a result, the court upheld the decision to grant the higher payscale from 17.09.1992, citing the petitioner's inaction in addressing the adverse remarks communicated in 1987 as a key factor in the outcome. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 08 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381475