<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 545 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the penalty imposed under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act unsustainable. The cash purchases for raw material declared during the search were deemed not undisclosed income, as there was no stock discrepancy. The penalty was deleted as it was considered illegal, unjustified, and arbitrary. The Tribunal also noted the invalidity of penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer due to the lack of specificity in the show cause notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574895" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 545 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, finding the penalty imposed under Section 271AAB of the Income Tax Act unsustainable. The cash purchases for raw material declared during the search were deemed not undisclosed income, as there was no stock discrepancy. The penalty was deleted as it was considered illegal, unjustified, and arbitrary. The Tribunal also noted the invalidity of penalty proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer due to the lack of specificity in the show cause notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>