<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 538 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381461</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to re-examine the arm&#039;s length price adjustments for imported capital assets and management service charges. It also instructed the AO to allow the set-off of brought forward business loss. The judgment underscores the importance of proper benchmarking, verification of claims, adherence to prescribed methods, and providing a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 17:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574883" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 538 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381461</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to re-examine the arm&#039;s length price adjustments for imported capital assets and management service charges. It also instructed the AO to allow the set-off of brought forward business loss. The judgment underscores the importance of proper benchmarking, verification of claims, adherence to prescribed methods, and providing a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381461</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>