<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 537 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381460</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for AY 2008-09 by deleting the disallowance of advertisement expenses and directing fresh consideration on the provision for gratuity. However, the disallowances of provision for warranty and consequential additions to book profit under section 115JB were upheld. The appeal for AY 2009-10 was dismissed based on the principle of consistency. The Tribunal&#039;s order was pronounced on May 22, 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574881" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 537 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381460</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal for AY 2008-09 by deleting the disallowance of advertisement expenses and directing fresh consideration on the provision for gratuity. However, the disallowances of provision for warranty and consequential additions to book profit under section 115JB were upheld. The appeal for AY 2009-10 was dismissed based on the principle of consistency. The Tribunal&#039;s order was pronounced on May 22, 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381460</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>