<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 524 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381447</link>
    <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal disposed of the appeals, acknowledging the settlement between the parties and quashing the NCLT&#039;s directions for prosecution under Section 73(4) of the Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal allowed the ROC and SFIO to proceed with any other investigations or actions based on separate material beyond the original grievance of non-repayment of the deposit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 524 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381447</link>
      <description>The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal disposed of the appeals, acknowledging the settlement between the parties and quashing the NCLT&#039;s directions for prosecution under Section 73(4) of the Companies Act, 2013. The tribunal allowed the ROC and SFIO to proceed with any other investigations or actions based on separate material beyond the original grievance of non-repayment of the deposit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>