<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 521 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381444</link>
    <description>A complaint cannot be dismissed under Section 204(4) CrPC without recording when process was ordered, when payment became due, and why non-payment persisted beyond a reasonable time. Section 256 CrPC gives the court discretion to acquit for non-appearance of the complainant, but the court may adjourn where appropriate. Where the complainant&#039;s evidence has already been recorded and cross-examined, the matter should ordinarily be decided on the evidence on record rather than by a cryptic dismissal for non-payment of process. The dismissal of the complaint and consequent acquittal were therefore set aside, and the case was directed to be decided on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:48:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 521 - TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381444</link>
      <description>A complaint cannot be dismissed under Section 204(4) CrPC without recording when process was ordered, when payment became due, and why non-payment persisted beyond a reasonable time. Section 256 CrPC gives the court discretion to acquit for non-appearance of the complainant, but the court may adjourn where appropriate. Where the complainant&#039;s evidence has already been recorded and cross-examined, the matter should ordinarily be decided on the evidence on record rather than by a cryptic dismissal for non-payment of process. The dismissal of the complaint and consequent acquittal were therefore set aside, and the case was directed to be decided on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>