https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381434 The appellant, engaged in providing photography services, was found to have irregularities in paying service tax for the period 2001-2004. The Department identified discrepancies leading to short payments. The appellant sought abatement under Notification No.12/2003, which was disputed. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was initially upheld but overturned on appeal due to the longer period of limitation not being applicable. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for the specified period. en-us Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 12 Jun 2019 06:36:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381434 The appellant, engaged in providing photography services, was found to have irregularities in paying service tax for the period 2001-2004. The Department identified discrepancies leading to short payments. The appellant sought abatement under Notification No.12/2003, which was disputed. The demand for service tax, interest, and penalties was initially upheld but overturned on appeal due to the longer period of limitation not being applicable. The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demand for the specified period. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 25 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381434