<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 510 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381433</link>
    <description>The Court found the Civil Revision Petitions maintainable, ruling that the statutory remedy for appealable orders under the Central Excise Act excludes Civil Court jurisdiction. The Court exercised jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to uphold proper administration of justice and prevent circumvention of the established dispute resolution mechanism. As a result, all three Civil Revision Petitions were allowed without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Nov 2019 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574841" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 510 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381433</link>
      <description>The Court found the Civil Revision Petitions maintainable, ruling that the statutory remedy for appealable orders under the Central Excise Act excludes Civil Court jurisdiction. The Court exercised jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to uphold proper administration of justice and prevent circumvention of the established dispute resolution mechanism. As a result, all three Civil Revision Petitions were allowed without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381433</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>