<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 506 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381429</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the differential duty demand on merit but restricted it to the normal time limit, setting aside penalties. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, considering the arguments presented by both sides and the legal precedents cited.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 05:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 506 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381429</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the differential duty demand on merit but restricted it to the normal time limit, setting aside penalties. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, considering the arguments presented by both sides and the legal precedents cited.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>