<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1641 - ITAT INDORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281286</link>
    <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of surrendered income under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to lack of corroborative evidence linking the income to incriminating material. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. Additionally, the ITAT quashed the penalty order citing flaws in the initiation of penalty proceedings, leading to the assessee&#039;s appeal being allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 19:33:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1641 - ITAT INDORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281286</link>
      <description>The ITAT upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of surrendered income under section 132(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, due to lack of corroborative evidence linking the income to incriminating material. The revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. Additionally, the ITAT quashed the penalty order citing flaws in the initiation of penalty proceedings, leading to the assessee&#039;s appeal being allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>