https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281272 The earlier writ judgment granting reassignment of seniority and consequential benefits had attained finality after the intra-court appeal and SLP were dismissed. Dismissal of contempt petitions did not determine the employee's substantive entitlement to the monetary benefits flowing from that final judgment. The authority could not refuse arrears on the ground that the employee had not actually worked where the Court had directed consequential relief for wrongful deprivation of promotion or benefits. The fresh writ petition was maintainable, and the employee was held entitled to the consequential monetary benefits directed earlier; the Board's objection was rejected. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jun 2019 15:10:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281272 The earlier writ judgment granting reassignment of seniority and consequential benefits had attained finality after the intra-court appeal and SLP were dismissed. Dismissal of contempt petitions did not determine the employee's substantive entitlement to the monetary benefits flowing from that final judgment. The authority could not refuse arrears on the ground that the employee had not actually worked where the Court had directed consequential relief for wrongful deprivation of promotion or benefits. The fresh writ petition was maintainable, and the employee was held entitled to the consequential monetary benefits directed earlier; the Board's objection was rejected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281272