<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (12) TMI 1183 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281270</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee-company, ruling to delete the imposed penalty under sec. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The company had disclosed all material facts, genuinely believed the expenses were allowable, and the Assessing Officer had not proven the claim to be false, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 13:26:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574762" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (12) TMI 1183 - ITAT JODHPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281270</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee-company, ruling to delete the imposed penalty under sec. 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The company had disclosed all material facts, genuinely believed the expenses were allowable, and the Assessing Officer had not proven the claim to be false, leading to the deletion of the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281270</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>