<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 481 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381404</link>
    <description>The court determined that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer were not barred by limitation under Section 153(2A) of the Income Tax Act. However, the delay of 8 years and 7 months in initiating the reassessment proceedings was deemed unreasonable and inordinate. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned notice and restrained the Department from further proceedings for fresh assessment for the relevant Assessment Year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2019 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574731" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 481 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381404</link>
      <description>The court determined that the reassessment proceedings initiated by the Assessing Officer were not barred by limitation under Section 153(2A) of the Income Tax Act. However, the delay of 8 years and 7 months in initiating the reassessment proceedings was deemed unreasonable and inordinate. Consequently, the court set aside the impugned notice and restrained the Department from further proceedings for fresh assessment for the relevant Assessment Year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381404</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>