<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 465 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the addition of Long Term Capital Gain. The Assessee was found eligible for deduction under section 54, as investments were made within the specified time limit. Discrepancies in statements regarding the sale and purchase of properties were clarified, with the Tribunal determining that the Assessee had not repurchased a property but invested in a different one.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 06:25:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 465 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, directing the AO to delete the addition of Long Term Capital Gain. The Assessee was found eligible for deduction under section 54, as investments were made within the specified time limit. Discrepancies in statements regarding the sale and purchase of properties were clarified, with the Tribunal determining that the Assessee had not repurchased a property but invested in a different one.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>