<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 453 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381376</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant in a case concerning the eligibility of refund for accumulated CENVAT Credit on services provided to Qualcomm, USA, and the eligibility of CENVAT Credit on input services used in different offices. The Tribunal found the denial of refund unsustainable, upheld the Appellant&#039;s contentions, and deemed the cash refund admissible. Additionally, specific input services like Rent a cab service, convention service, club or association service were held to be admissible under the CENVAT Credit Rules. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowed the appeals, and granted consequential relief as per law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 06:24:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574693" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 453 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381376</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant in a case concerning the eligibility of refund for accumulated CENVAT Credit on services provided to Qualcomm, USA, and the eligibility of CENVAT Credit on input services used in different offices. The Tribunal found the denial of refund unsustainable, upheld the Appellant&#039;s contentions, and deemed the cash refund admissible. Additionally, specific input services like Rent a cab service, convention service, club or association service were held to be admissible under the CENVAT Credit Rules. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowed the appeals, and granted consequential relief as per law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381376</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>