https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381374 The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition filed by a partnership firm, Sri Balaji Traders, and noted the absence of the prefix 'M/s' in the firm's name. Despite challenges, the Court proceeded to evaluate the petition on its merits. The petitioner faced a reversal of Input Tax Credit and a penalty due to non-response to notices, with explanations deemed inadequate. The Court emphasized partners' collective responsibility and dismissed the petition due to delays in filing and lack of merit, without imposing costs. en-us Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jun 2019 06:23:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381374 The High Court considered the maintainability of a writ petition filed by a partnership firm, Sri Balaji Traders, and noted the absence of the prefix 'M/s' in the firm's name. Despite challenges, the Court proceeded to evaluate the petition on its merits. The petitioner faced a reversal of Input Tax Credit and a penalty due to non-response to notices, with explanations deemed inadequate. The Court emphasized partners' collective responsibility and dismissed the petition due to delays in filing and lack of merit, without imposing costs. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 04 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381374