https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381371 A criminal complaint arising from disputed cheque transactions was found to be an abuse of process where the cheques bore the complainant's admitted signature, the dishonour memo showed insufficiency of funds, and the allegations of theft, forgery and fabricated liability documents were vague and unsupported. The process had been issued mechanically against multiple accused despite parallel civil disputes and pending cheque-related proceedings, giving the prosecution the character of a counterblast rather than a case fit for criminal trial. The proceedings and the order issuing process were therefore quashed and set aside. en-us Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jun 2019 06:23:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381371 A criminal complaint arising from disputed cheque transactions was found to be an abuse of process where the cheques bore the complainant's admitted signature, the dishonour memo showed insufficiency of funds, and the allegations of theft, forgery and fabricated liability documents were vague and unsupported. The process had been issued mechanically against multiple accused despite parallel civil disputes and pending cheque-related proceedings, giving the prosecution the character of a counterblast rather than a case fit for criminal trial. The proceedings and the order issuing process were therefore quashed and set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 07 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381371