https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281257 The tribunal rejected the application under Section 9 of the IBC due to the substantial dispute between the parties regarding delays in work completion and quantification of damages. Citing the Mobilox case, it emphasized the need for further investigation when faced with a plausible contention. The tribunal concluded that the matter should be decided by a civil court, leading to the rejection of the application with no costs awarded. en-us Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Jun 2019 06:00:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281257 The tribunal rejected the application under Section 9 of the IBC due to the substantial dispute between the parties regarding delays in work completion and quantification of damages. Citing the Mobilox case, it emphasized the need for further investigation when faced with a plausible contention. The tribunal concluded that the matter should be decided by a civil court, leading to the rejection of the application with no costs awarded. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 13 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281257