<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (2) TMI 879 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281249</link>
    <description>The High Court renotified the case, prohibiting coercive measures by the respondent until the Tribunal decides on the appeal. The issue of remanding to the Transfer Pricing Officer was left to the Tribunal&#039;s discretion. Emphasizing timely appeal resolution, the Court instructed no adjournments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 16:32:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (2) TMI 879 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281249</link>
      <description>The High Court renotified the case, prohibiting coercive measures by the respondent until the Tribunal decides on the appeal. The issue of remanding to the Transfer Pricing Officer was left to the Tribunal&#039;s discretion. Emphasizing timely appeal resolution, the Court instructed no adjournments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281249</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>