<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 433 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381356</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed on the assessee for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were invalid due to the lack of specific charges in the show-cause notice and the incorrect application of the penalty provision. The penalty was deleted on legal grounds, emphasizing the necessity of specifying the exact charge in penalty notices. The decision was pronounced on 06th June 2019.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 06:12:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574605" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 433 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381356</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, deleting the penalty imposed on the assessee for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The Tribunal found that the penalty proceedings were invalid due to the lack of specific charges in the show-cause notice and the incorrect application of the penalty provision. The penalty was deleted on legal grounds, emphasizing the necessity of specifying the exact charge in penalty notices. The decision was pronounced on 06th June 2019.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>