https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381343 The High Court declined to decide the merits of the Section 12A IBC issues or the ancillary questions raised, noting the availability of alternative appellate remedies. It instead granted a narrowly tailored interim protective direction so that any adverse order in the Section 12A proceedings would not be given effect for 10 days, enabling the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court. The protection was limited in scope and duration and was issued solely to preserve the right to pursue appellate relief, without adjudicating the substantive dispute or the related criminal and insolvency settlement contentions. en-us Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 10 Jun 2019 06:11:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381343 The High Court declined to decide the merits of the Section 12A IBC issues or the ancillary questions raised, noting the availability of alternative appellate remedies. It instead granted a narrowly tailored interim protective direction so that any adverse order in the Section 12A proceedings would not be given effect for 10 days, enabling the petitioner to approach the Supreme Court. The protection was limited in scope and duration and was issued solely to preserve the right to pursue appellate relief, without adjudicating the substantive dispute or the related criminal and insolvency settlement contentions. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Tue, 30 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381343