<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (6) TMI 414 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381337</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the Supreme Court then examined the matter on merits. Finding the High Court&#039;s reasoned order consonant with law and requiring no interference, the Court affirmed that order and dismissed the appeal as devoid of merit. The operative effect was that the condonation application succeeded, but the substantive challenge failed after the Court declined to disturb the High Court&#039;s conclusions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2019 06:10:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=574575" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (6) TMI 414 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381337</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned, and the Supreme Court then examined the matter on merits. Finding the High Court&#039;s reasoned order consonant with law and requiring no interference, the Court affirmed that order and dismissed the appeal as devoid of merit. The operative effect was that the condonation application succeeded, but the substantive challenge failed after the Court declined to disturb the High Court&#039;s conclusions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=381337</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>