<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1995 (9) TMI 325 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18457</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to consider the amended ceiling law in valuing surplus lands, reducing their market value. However, the Tribunal erred in applying this reduced value to lands within the ceiling area that the assessee could retain. The court directed the Tribunal to reevaluate the market value separately for surplus lands and those within the ceiling area, based on their open market value under the Wealth-tax Act. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:14:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=57457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1995 (9) TMI 325 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18457</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to consider the amended ceiling law in valuing surplus lands, reducing their market value. However, the Tribunal erred in applying this reduced value to lands within the ceiling area that the assessee could retain. The court directed the Tribunal to reevaluate the market value separately for surplus lands and those within the ceiling area, based on their open market value under the Wealth-tax Act. No costs were awarded in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=18457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>