https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281233 The Supreme Court held that the Sewing Teacher was entitled to a lower pay scale compared to Classical and Vernacular Teachers due to differing educational qualifications. The Court emphasized the importance of considering specific rules and notifications governing pay scales for different categories of teachers. While acknowledging the principle of equal pay for equal work, the Court ruled that it did not apply in this case. Despite finding errors in the High Court's judgment, the Supreme Court declined to intervene under Article 136 due to the respondents already receiving the same pay scale and the respondent's status as a handicapped teacher. en-us Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jun 2019 12:26:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281233 The Supreme Court held that the Sewing Teacher was entitled to a lower pay scale compared to Classical and Vernacular Teachers due to differing educational qualifications. The Court emphasized the importance of considering specific rules and notifications governing pay scales for different categories of teachers. While acknowledging the principle of equal pay for equal work, the Court ruled that it did not apply in this case. Despite finding errors in the High Court's judgment, the Supreme Court declined to intervene under Article 136 due to the respondents already receiving the same pay scale and the respondent's status as a handicapped teacher. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 18 Mar 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281233