https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281231 In disciplinary matters, a tribunal should not interfere with the quantum of punishment unless there is legal justification for doing so; on the stated facts, interference with compulsory retirement was found to be beyond jurisdiction. The finding of breach of trust was not disturbed, and the reduction of penalty was set aside. Even so, the appellate court exercised constitutional discretion to grant limited relief in view of the lapse of time, retirement, and hardship, allowing the employee to retain superannuation benefits only, without extending any other benefit. en-us Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jun 2019 12:02:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281231 In disciplinary matters, a tribunal should not interfere with the quantum of punishment unless there is legal justification for doing so; on the stated facts, interference with compulsory retirement was found to be beyond jurisdiction. The finding of breach of trust was not disturbed, and the reduction of penalty was set aside. Even so, the appellate court exercised constitutional discretion to grant limited relief in view of the lapse of time, retirement, and hardship, allowing the employee to retain superannuation benefits only, without extending any other benefit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 12 Aug 1998 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281231