https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281228 Employees were held entitled to the intermediate wage grade under clause (5) of the agreement because their duties fit the category between a full-fledged clerk and an operative. Their claim was not barred by estoppel, as earlier proceedings did not amount to a claim that they were clerks, and the later agreement, being subsequent in time, varied the earlier award by mutual consent to the extent of inconsistency. The Court also declined interference under Article 136, since the substantive entitlement was correct on the merits and no failure of justice was shown. en-us Thu, 29 Oct 1959 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jun 2019 11:52:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281228 Employees were held entitled to the intermediate wage grade under clause (5) of the agreement because their duties fit the category between a full-fledged clerk and an operative. Their claim was not barred by estoppel, as earlier proceedings did not amount to a claim that they were clerks, and the later agreement, being subsequent in time, varied the earlier award by mutual consent to the extent of inconsistency. The Court also declined interference under Article 136, since the substantive entitlement was correct on the merits and no failure of justice was shown. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Oct 1959 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281228