https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281221 The appellate court confirmed the trial court's decision, dismissing the suit for Rs. 4,72,000 due to inconsistent evidence but decreeing the suit for Rs. 2,15,000 with interest. The court upheld findings that the pronotes were valid and binding on the defendants, with the 2nd defendant executing them both as the Manager of the joint family and as the Managing Partner of the 1st defendant firm. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the trial court's judgment and decree, and no costs were awarded for the appeals. en-us Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Jun 2019 10:45:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281221 The appellate court confirmed the trial court's decision, dismissing the suit for Rs. 4,72,000 due to inconsistent evidence but decreeing the suit for Rs. 2,15,000 with interest. The court upheld findings that the pronotes were valid and binding on the defendants, with the 2nd defendant executing them both as the Manager of the joint family and as the Managing Partner of the 1st defendant firm. The appeals were dismissed, affirming the trial court's judgment and decree, and no costs were awarded for the appeals. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 30 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=281221